FAA, Boeing and MCAS: Independent Panel Issues Damning Report On Boeing 737 Max Certification Effort. Here‘s What It Found.

The interagency commission’s findings on the certification of the new flight component system are both shocking and pretty much what everyone expected.

Boeing 737 Max
A 737 Max in flight. (photo courtesy: Boeing).
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • A draft report found both Boeing and the FAA were at fault for a flawed 737 Max certification process that failed to identify key vulnerabilities in the MCAS system, which was subsequently blamed for two fatal crashes.
  • Boeing is specifically criticized for poorly representing MCAS to regulators, failing to share changes made to the system during certification, and omitting MCAS from the 737 Max training manual.
  • The FAA is faulted for insufficient coordination among its staff and a fragmented understanding of MCAS, which led to inadequate certification oversight of the system.
  • The article notes that the FAA has already implemented changes to address the shortcomings identified in the report.
See a mistake? Contact us.
Boeing 737 Max
A Boeing 737 Max in flight. (Photo courtesy: Boeing)

In the certification process for the Boeing 737 Max, both Boeing and the FAA were at fault for a certification process that failed to identify key vulnerabilities in the plane’s Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a maneuvering stability system designed to keep the plane within the normal operating envelope. Instead, MCAS has been blamed for two fatal crashes that killed 346 people, this according to a story in the New York Times. The story is based on a draft version of the final report, the final version of which was expected to be released today.

According to the Times, the report found that Boeing did a poor job of representing the nature of MCAS to regulators, and FAA staff failed to coordinate their efforts sufficiently to understand the threat that MCAS posed, leading to an insufficient level of certification oversight of the system. In its story, the Times cites a passage from the draft report that’s particularly damning. From the Times story: “The report found that while the F.A.A. had been made aware of MCAS, “the information and discussions were so fragmented and were delivered to disconnected groups” that it was difficult to recognize the impacts and implications of this system.

The report, according to the story, also found that Boeing made changes to MCAS during the certification process and failed to share those changes with the FAA, and that Boeing’s omission of MCAS from the 737 Max training manual led to the FAA not being aware of the need for pilots to receive specific training on MCAS.

The story reported that the FAA has already made changes to address the shortcomings identified in the report.

Subscribe today to Plane & Pilot magazine for industry news, reviews and much more delivered straight to you!

Plane & Pilot

Plane + Pilot is general aviation’s only adventure-based magazine. From where to go, to how to get there, and everything in between, your next great adventure awaits.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get the latest Plane & Pilot Magazine stories delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE